Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can I get a status on this?
It's not gonna happen for 7.2, I think ...
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.post
Can I get a status on this?
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Note: I'm not convinced that relfilenode and pg_class.oid are each
> > used in exactly the right spots. Once we have cases where they can
> > differ, we may well find some bugs to flush out. But that needs to
> > happ
On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Note: I'm not convinced that relfilenode and pg_class.oid are each
> used in exactly the right spots. Once we have cases where they can
> differ, we may well find some bugs to flush out. But that needs to
> happen anyway, so don't let it dissuade you fro
>> I've been looking at CLUSTER today. I've put together a patch which
>> recreates all the indices which current CLUSTER drops and copies relacl
>> from the old pg_class tuple and puts it in the new one.
This is entirely the wrong way to go at it.
> We did strange things with this in the past
> Hi guys,
>
> I've been looking at CLUSTER today. I've put together a patch which
> recreates all the indices which current CLUSTER drops and copies relacl
> from the old pg_class tuple and puts it in the new one.
>
> I was working on updating pg_inherits to handle the new OID when it
> occure
