Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 20:43, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In both cases, the CHECK constraint uses a function that is stable or
volatile. It was suggested that fun
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 20:43, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 20:28:02 -0500,
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > In both cases, the CHECK constraint uses a function that is stable or
> > > volatile. It was suggested that
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 20:28:02 -0500,
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In both cases, the CHECK constraint uses a function that is stable or
> > volatile. It was suggested that functions used in CHECK constraints be
> > restricted to imm
Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In both cases, the CHECK constraint uses a function that is stable or
> volatile. It was suggested that functions used in CHECK constraints be
> restricted to immutable,
This seems reasonable to me. I'm a bit surprised we do not have such a
check
