On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 01:00:50AM +0300, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote:
> I'm mostly convinced by the power of all the parameters that already
> exist, given that you added both saslname and saslchannelbinding to the
> already existing sslmode. That's great, and allows for very fine choosing
On 14/07/17 13:29, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa
wrote:
If the parameter authmethod would rather be "authmethods", i.e., a list,
I think it would be significantly more flexible.
Yes, but the handling of a list becomes messier if there
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa
wrote:
> If the parameter authmethod would rather be "authmethods", i.e., a list,
> I think it would be significantly more flexible.
Yes, but the handling of a list becomes messier if there are some
other connection parameters that ar
On 14/07/17 11:09, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa
wrote:
There has been some prior discussion, that we recently continued at
pgday.ru, about what to do if a client wants to use a "strong"
authentication mechanism but a rogue server forces
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa
wrote:
> There has been some prior discussion, that we recently continued at
> pgday.ru, about what to do if a client wants to use a "strong"
> authentication mechanism but a rogue server forces the client to use a
> weaker authenticati
