Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I'm curious about is where the original behaviour came from. Is
> it just because insert with subscripts was never implemented? Or was
> there a rationale for ignoring the subscripts?
It's been awhile, but I think that "ignore the subscripts" may have
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I would like to do about this is define INSERT to a subscripted
> column name as working the same way that an assignment to a element or
> slice of a zero-dimension array presently does --- that is, you get an
> actual array back and not a NULL. It wou
