On 2016-03-08 18:24:23 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
>
> > I do wonder if adding a PGCTLPOSTGRESWRAPPER or something to pg_ctl
> > would be ok. That'd just supplant calling the postgres binary, making
> > all this easier.
>
> This seems a reasonably principled way to go abou
Andres Freund wrote:
> I do wonder if adding a PGCTLPOSTGRESWRAPPER or something to pg_ctl
> would be ok. That'd just supplant calling the postgres binary, making
> all this easier.
This seems a reasonably principled way to go about this. Eventually we
might plug other things in it ...
--
Álva
On 2016-03-08 08:58:22 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 03/07/2016 08:39 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >Does anybody have a better idea about how to do this?
>
> Why not just create a make target which does this? It could be run after
> 'make' and before 'make check'. I would make it assume valgrind
On 03/07/2016 08:39 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
I'm setting up a buildfarm animal that runs under
valgrind. Unfortunately there's not really any good solution to force
make check et al. to start postgres wrapped in valgrind. For now I've
resorted to adding something like
sub replace_postgre
Hi,
On 2016-03-07 17:39:30 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> I'm setting up a buildfarm animal that runs under valgrind.
Which is now running as 'skink'. The first failed due to a missing trick
in the wrapper script, but the second one looks like it had a legit
issue:
http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/s
