* Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote:
> On 2015-08-28 08:49:24 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >
> > + /*
> > +* get_row_security_policies just added to
> > securityQuals and/or
> > +* withCheckOptions, and the
* Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote:
> On 2015-08-28 08:49:24 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >
> > + /*
> > +* get_row_security_policies just added to
> > securityQuals and/or
> > +* withCheckOptions, and the
* Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote:
> On 2015-08-28 08:49:24 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >
> > + /*
> > +* get_row_security_policies just added to
> > securityQuals and/or
> > +* withCheckOptions, and the
On 2015-08-28 08:49:24 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> + /*
> + * get_row_security_policies just added to
> securityQuals and/or
> + * withCheckOptions, and there were SubLinks,
> so make sure
> +
* Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rash...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 27 August 2015 at 13:49, Andres Freund wrote:
> > The locking around rowsecurity policy expressions seems to be
> > insufficient:
> > SELECT * FROM document WHERE f_leak(dtitle) ORDER BY did;
> > WARNING: RelationIdGetRelation(247984) without
On 27 August 2015 at 13:49, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The locking around rowsecurity policy expressions seems to be
> insufficient:
> SELECT * FROM document WHERE f_leak(dtitle) ORDER BY did;
> WARNING: RelationIdGetRelation(247984) without holding lock on the relation
> WARNING: relation_o
