Re: [HACKERS] 7.4.2 Build broken on (Sparc) Solaris 7 and 8

2004-03-21 Thread Bruce Momjian
Jim Seymour wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > OK, patch attached and applied. It adds configure tests for the 5-arg > > version of getpwuid_r() and properly falls back to the Posix draft > > version you have on Solaris. Seems Solaris 9 also still has the dra

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4.2 Build broken on (Sparc) Solaris 7 and 8

2004-03-21 Thread Jim Seymour
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip] > > OK, patch attached and applied. It adds configure tests for the 5-arg > version of getpwuid_r() and properly falls back to the Posix draft > version you have on Solaris. Seems Solaris 9 also still has the draft > version. [snip] Well, yes a

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4.2 Build broken on (Sparc) Solaris 7 and 8

2004-03-13 Thread Jim Seymour
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [snip] > > (I also see some post-7.4.1 changes in src/template/solaris, so you > possibly should look there too.) [snip] > I think I have the fix for part of it, but this remains... gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4.2 Build broken on (Sparc) Solaris 7 and 8

2004-03-13 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Seymour) writes: > Diff'ing thread.c between 7.4.1 and 7.4.2, it *looks* like, at first > blush, nothing changed that should affect the relevant code. > Anybody got any idea what's broken? The relevant change is probably this one: 2004-02-11 12:32 momjian * confi