Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > The libpq SSL memory leak reported on -bugs would be good to fix.
> >
> > We don't know yet if that's our bug or not.
> >
> > > BTW, is there a particular reason we're pushing out 7.4.1 so soon?
> > > ISTM t
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> That's no fix --- it will break the code on compilers without long long.
> Here are the emails describing the problem. Seems they should see how
> we do time differences in the backend as an example.
Now that I look at it, the code i
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am still reading email from yesterday, but this is a new patch in the
> > past 2 days. The problem is that time differences were overflowing int
> > values if the vacuum took a long time, or something like that. The fix
> > is to c
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am still reading email from yesterday, but this is a new patch in the
> past 2 days. The problem is that time differences were overflowing int
> values if the vacuum took a long time, or something like that. The fix
> is to cast one to long long.
Tha
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So we have SSL, information schema (bit), and autovacuum. The last one
> > is an easy fix, not sure on the others.
>
> I thought you already applied those autovacuum patches? Is there
> something else pending for it?
I am still rea
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So we have SSL, information schema (bit), and autovacuum. The last one
> is an easy fix, not sure on the others.
I thought you already applied those autovacuum patches? Is there
something else pending for it?
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The libpq SSL memory leak reported on -bugs would be good to fix.
>
> We don't know yet if that's our bug or not.
>
> > BTW, is there a particular reason we're pushing out 7.4.1 so soon?
> > ISTM there wouldn't be anything wrong with
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The libpq SSL memory leak reported on -bugs would be good to fix.
We don't know yet if that's our bug or not.
> BTW, is there a particular reason we're pushing out 7.4.1 so soon?
> ISTM there wouldn't be anything wrong with waiting a week or two...
Well
Neil Conway wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > To accomodate ppls travel scheduales, we are going to move the 7.4.1
> > release up to Monday, *unless* there is a report before then about
> > something that needs to be fixed first
>
> The libpq SSL memory leak reported on -
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To accomodate ppls travel scheduales, we are going to move the 7.4.1
> release up to Monday, *unless* there is a report before then about
> something that needs to be fixed first
The libpq SSL memory leak reported on -bugs would be good to fix.
BTW
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>> A bug in the information schema concerning the bit types must be
> >>> fixed.
> >>
> >> Does anyone have a patch for this?
>
> > I suppose not, but it's being worked on.
>
> What's the bug exactly? Is it worth delaying the rel
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> A bug in the information schema concerning the bit types must be
>>> fixed.
>>
>> Does anyone have a patch for this?
> I suppose not, but it's being worked on.
What's the bug exactly? Is it worth delaying the release for? Given
that Bruce is out
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I suppose not, but it's being worked on.
Is that the one that Joe just mentioned workign on? about BYTEA?
I don't think so.
Joe
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubs
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > A bug in the information schema concerning the bit types must be
> > > fixed.
> >
> > Does anyone have a patch for this?
>
> I suppose not, but it's being worked on.
Is that the one that Joe just mentioned workign on? ab
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > A bug in the information schema concerning the bit types must be
> > fixed.
>
> Does anyone have a patch for this?
I suppose not, but it's being worked on.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archi
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
To accomodate ppls travel scheduales, we are going to move the 7.4.1
release up to Monday, *unless* there is a report before then about
something that needs to be fixed first ... we know of nothing outstanding
right now ...
This means it will be tag'd/bundled on Sunday ...
Marc G. Fournier writes:
> To accomodate ppls travel scheduales, we are going to move the 7.4.1
> release up to Monday, *unless* there is a report before then about
> something that needs to be fixed first ... we know of nothing outstanding
> right now ...
A bug in the information schema concerni
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier writes:
>
> > To accomodate ppls travel scheduales, we are going to move the 7.4.1
> > release up to Monday, *unless* there is a report before then about
> > something that needs to be fixed first ... we know of nothing outstanding
> >
--On Friday, December 05, 2003 12:47:40 -0400 "Marc G. Fournier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To accomodate ppls travel scheduales, we are going to move the 7.4.1
release up to Monday, *unless* there is a report before then about
something that needs to be fixed first ... we know of nothing outst
19 matches
Mail list logo
