Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-10-03 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Alvaro Herrera writes: > While reviewing someone else's translation of pg_dump I noted that the > phrase "ACL list" is used in a couple of places. However ACL stands for > "Access Control List", so the term "ACL list" seems redundant. These kinds of redundancies are pretty common for the sake of

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-10-03 Thread Alvaro Herrera
While reviewing someone else's translation of pg_dump I noted that the phrase "ACL list" is used in a couple of places. However ACL stands for "Access Control List", so the term "ACL list" seems redundant. Maybe it should be replaced with plain "ACL"? -- Alvaro Herrera () "I think my standards

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-10-01 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Patrick Welche writes: > Does this count a string change? :) Yes, but it's also a documentation bug fix. Anyway, you got it in before the freeze. :) -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lis

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-10-01 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Alvaro Herrera writes: > The only things left that I can see are > > #: commands/tablecmds.c:4093 > msgid "tables \"%s\" already has a TOAST table" > "tables" -> "table" Fixed. > #: commands/user.c:651 commands/user.c:1357 > msgid "sysid %d is already assigned" > "sysid" -> "user ID"? Not sure,

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-10-01 Thread Patrick Welche
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:50:23PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tom Lane writes: > > > At the very least we need to set a strings freeze soon, so the > > translators can catch up. Peter, are you getting close to done with the > > message revisions you've been making? > > Yes, I think we're r

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-30 Thread Hannu Krosing
Bruce Momjian kirjutas T, 30.09.2003 kell 02:16: > Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > ! Faster regular expression code > > > > We could tout more functionality too, since the new regex package > > has a lot of advanced stuff that wasn't there before. > > Added "more powerful" > This wording co

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > SSL > > ! Major improvements in SSL performance and security > > Did we actually add any "security" to the SSL code? Performance and > reliability, maybe, but I didn't think we'd done anything to the > security algorithms

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-29 Thread Tom Lane
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > SSL > ! Major improvements in SSL performance and security Did we actually add any "security" to the SSL code? Performance and reliability, maybe, but I didn't think we'd done anything to the security algorithms per se. Did I miss something

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-29 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:50:23PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tom Lane writes: > > > At the very least we need to set a strings freeze soon, so the > > translators can catch up. Peter, are you getting close to done with the > > message revisions you've been making? > > Yes, I think we're r

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-29 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane writes: > At the very least we need to set a strings freeze soon, so the > translators can catch up. Peter, are you getting close to done with the > message revisions you've been making? Yes, I think we're ready for a string freeze. Alvaro, do you have anything you still want to submit

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-29 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. --- Neil Conway wrote: > On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 14:57, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I have emptied the patch queue, and have updated the HISTORY file for > > 7.4. I am looking for any improvements to th

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-29 Thread Neil Conway
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 14:57, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I have emptied the patch queue, and have updated the HISTORY file for > 7.4. I am looking for any improvements to that file. (I have to move > it to SGML soon.) A patch that improves HISTORY is attached. I added a few bullet items to the "high

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-29 Thread Tom Lane
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Should we maybe get a Beta4 out now that everything is caught up code > wise? Is anyone still sitting on something (other then the translations > stuff) that should be in v7.4? We still have several open items in Bruce's list, but maybe we can reso

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-29 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Should we maybe get a Beta4 out now that everything is caught up code wise? Is anyone still sitting on something (other then the translations stuff) that should be in v7.4? On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Perhaps it is time to start looking a

Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 status

2003-09-29 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Perhaps it is time to start looking at a final release date for 7.4? At the very least we need to set a strings freeze soon, so the translators can catch up. Peter, are you getting close to done with the message revisions you've been making?