Re: [HACKERS] 2Q implementaion for PostgreSQL buffer replacement.

2003-06-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch removed at author's request. --- Yutaka tanida wrote: > Hi. > > I implement 2Q algorithm to PostgreSQL for buffer management , instead > of LRU. > It's known as low overhead and high performance than LRU. If you have

Re: [HACKERS] 2Q implementaion for PostgreSQL buffer replacement.

2003-06-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
OK, thanks. I will remove it from the queue, and someone suggested a different algorithm today: > I was researching on cache replacement strategy as well. 2Q has one > disadvantage see this exellent paper: > http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/people/dmodha/#ARC see the paper > "ARC: A Self-Tuning, Low

Re: [HACKERS] 2Q implementaion for PostgreSQL buffer replacement.

2003-06-24 Thread Yutaka tanida
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 23:49:17 -0400 (EDT) Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Looks good to me --- we will include it in 7.4. Thanks.But please note it is not completed yet. I must implement more , and move configurable parameter to postgresql.conf file. -- Yutaka tanida <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [HACKERS] 2Q implementaion for PostgreSQL buffer replacement.

2003-06-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Looks good to me --- we will include it in 7.4. Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. --