Re: [HACKERS] -HEAD build failure on OpenBSD 3.6-current/Sparc64

2004-10-05 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Tom Lane wrote: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom Lane wrote: Why did you remove -DPIC ? uhm partly because I sent the wrong patch and partly because I didn't understood what that to do anyway(in the !Sparc case). The only place I can find on my machine where defining PIC seem

Re: [HACKERS] -HEAD build failure on OpenBSD 3.6-current/Sparc64 +patch

2004-10-05 Thread Tom Lane
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Why did you remove -DPIC ? > uhm partly because I sent the wrong patch and partly because I didn't > understood what that to do anyway(in the !Sparc case). The only place I > can find on my machine where defining PIC seems to

Re: [HACKERS] -HEAD build failure on OpenBSD 3.6-current/Sparc64

2004-10-04 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Tom Lane wrote: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: this one got caught by the testfarm as well - it looks like the openbsd-specific makefile is missing a -fPIC for the Sparc platform(I would assume that at least NetBSD/sparc is affected too but I don't have access to such a system

Re: [HACKERS] -HEAD build failure on OpenBSD 3.6-current/Sparc64 +patch

2004-10-04 Thread Tom Lane
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > this one got caught by the testfarm as well - it looks like the > openbsd-specific makefile is missing a -fPIC for the Sparc platform(I > would assume that at least NetBSD/sparc is affected too but I don't have > access to such a system to test