Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 05:01:39PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Oh, got -/_ mixed up. Fixed with attached applied patch.
> Oops, that text is talking about Python's configure, so I put the text
> back. Seemed we had _no_ mention of our own --enable-shared.
Yeah, I just
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:50:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 02:27:15AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> We should just remove it now.
>
> > --disable-shared removed, with the attached, applied patch.
>
> No documentation changes?
I couldn't f
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 05:01:39PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:57:30PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:50:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> No documentation changes?
> >
> > > I couldn't find any place we document it.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:57:30PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:50:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> No documentation changes?
>
> > I couldn't find any place we document it. I did:
> > grep _shared *.sgml
> > and no hits were returned. Should
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:50:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> No documentation changes?
> I couldn't find any place we document it. I did:
> grep _shared *.sgml
> and no hits were returned. Should I search for something else?
It's --enable-shared, not --enable_shar
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 02:27:15AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> We should just remove it now.
> --disable-shared removed, with the attached, applied patch.
No documentation changes?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 02:27:15AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On lör, 2012-05-26 at 15:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > 2. Seeing that this is the first complaint since 9.0, should we decide
> > that --disable-shared is no longer worth supporting? Seems like we
> > should either make this case
On lör, 2012-05-26 at 15:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> 2. Seeing that this is the first complaint since 9.0, should we decide
> that --disable-shared is no longer worth supporting? Seems like we
> should either make this case work or remove this switch.
I think the last remaining use was the QNX po
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> 2. Seeing that this is the first complaint since 9.0, should we decide
> that --disable-shared is no longer worth supporting? Seems like we
> should either make this case work or remove this switch. I notice
> that the switch isn't documented a
