On Sunday 12 April 2009 18:06:48 Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
> > I don't think there is much you can do here. Either leave it out, or
> > write "CANNOT HAPPEN", or just translate normally.
>
> But Alvaro's complaint that the current coding is incorrect for English
> still stands, n
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> I don't think there is much you can do here. Either leave it out, or write
> "CANNOT HAPPEN", or just translate normally.
But Alvaro's complaint that the current coding is incorrect for English
still stands, no? Or does ngettext choose the second string for n = 0?
On Sunday 12 April 2009 04:10:07 Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> So it turns out that for the string above it doesn't make any sense to
> have the %d being exactly 1: the code is
> So ntups is either 0, or it's greater than 1 -- the first message does
> not really make sense to me ...
>
> I'm not really s
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> #: pg_dump.c:5011
> #, c-format
> msgid "expected %d check constraint on table \"%s\" but found %d\n"
> msgid_plural "expected %d check constraints on table \"%s\" but found %d\n"
Sorry, I'm an idiot -- the one I wanted to paste was
#: pg_dump.c:6344 pg_dump.c:6543 pg_dum
