2010/1/15 Vincenzo Romano :
> 2010/1/15 Pavel Stehule :
>> I disagree with this functionality for USING clause. Main parser
>> doesn't support some enhanced syntax. But we can discus about some
>> function 'printf' or 'format' that can help with similar task.
>>
>> some like
>>
>> EXECUTE format('A
2010/1/15 Pavel Stehule :
> I disagree with this functionality for USING clause. Main parser
> doesn't support some enhanced syntax. But we can discus about some
> function 'printf' or 'format' that can help with similar task.
>
> some like
>
> EXECUTE format('ALTER TABLE % ADD CHECK (col1=% AND co
2010/1/15 Vincenzo Romano :
> 2010/1/14 Pavel Stehule :
>> Hello
>>
>> I thing, so this is bad idea.
>>
>> a) this behave depends on DDL implementation, not plpgsql implementation
>>
>> b) proposed implementation needs some escape magic. This was first
>> implementation of USING clause and it was r
2010/1/14 Pavel Stehule :
> Hello
>
> I thing, so this is bad idea.
>
> a) this behave depends on DDL implementation, not plpgsql implementation
>
> b) proposed implementation needs some escape magic. This was first
> implementation of USING clause and it was rejected. Some composite and
> nested v
Hello
I thing, so this is bad idea.
a) this behave depends on DDL implementation, not plpgsql implementation
b) proposed implementation needs some escape magic. This was first
implementation of USING clause and it was rejected. Some composite and
nested values are significant break.
see in arch