Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] to_char and Roman Numeral (RN) bug

2001-09-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have checked this in CVS and it is working fine. Karel, have you fixed this? I can't find a place where I have applied a fix for this. > Good day, > > Sorry to post to this list about a patch, but I seem to be having some > difficult getting on the pgsql-patches list; keep getting an "ille

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] to_char and Roman Numeral (RN) bug

2001-09-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 07:28:50PM -0700, Command Prompt, Inc. wrote: > > > In documenting the to_char() function for transformation of numbers to > > text, I noticed that the "RN" template character sequence was displaying > > some unusual behavior; specifically, unless in fill mode (with the

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] to_char and Roman Numeral (RN) bug

2001-09-04 Thread Karel Zak
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 11:37:48AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 07:28:50PM -0700, Command Prompt, Inc. wrote: > > > > > In documenting the to_char() function for transformation of numbers to > > > text, I noticed that the "RN" template character sequence was displaying

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] to_char and Roman Numeral (RN) bug

2001-09-04 Thread Karel Zak
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 07:28:50PM -0700, Command Prompt, Inc. wrote: > In documenting the to_char() function for transformation of numbers to > text, I noticed that the "RN" template character sequence was displaying > some unusual behavior; specifically, unless in fill mode (with the "FM" > seq