On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 23:26 +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > New patch enclosed, implementation as you've requested.
> >
> > Not ready to apply yet, but good for testing.
> >
>
> A quick test using the setup for "Buffer cache is not scan resistant"
> thread:
>
> Firstly van
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 09:42 +, Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > COPY command now also uses this hint, to allow test results and
> > discussion. Others could also, perhaps needing different values.
>
> Hm. It occurs to me that different commands may want d
"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> COPY command now also uses this hint, to allow test results and
> discussion. Others could also, perhaps needing different values.
Hm. It occurs to me that different commands may want different size buffer
rings.
As I understand it the reason your buf
