).
--
Rod
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rod Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Hackers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:24 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] YADP - Yet another Dep
"Rod Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 3. Isn't there a better way to find the initial dependencies? That
>> SELECT is truly ugly, and more to the point is highly likely to
>> break anytime someone rearranges the catalogs.
> I'm having a really hard time coming up with a good method for thi
> 3. Isn't there a better way to find the initial dependencies? That
> SELECT is truly ugly, and more to the point is highly likely to
break
> anytime someone rearranges the catalogs. I'd like to see it
generated
> automatically (maybe using a tool like findoidjoins); or perhaps we
> could do th
Rod Taylor wrote:
> [ copied to hackers ]
>
> > 1. I don't like the code that installs and removes ad-hoc
> dependencies
> > from relations to type Oid. On its own terms it's wrong (if it were
Looks good to me. I realize this is a huge chunk of code. The only
ultra-minor thing I saw was the u
[ copied to hackers ]
> 1. I don't like the code that installs and removes ad-hoc
dependencies
> from relations to type Oid. On its own terms it's wrong (if it were
...
> explicit representation of pinning in the pg_depends table, perhaps
it
> would work to create a row claiming that "table 0 /
