Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.

2012-09-04 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander writes: >> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. >>> >>> This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something* >>> here. > >> We have cascading replica

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.

2012-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:11:45PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander writes: > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. > >> > >> This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something* > >> here. > > > We have

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.

2012-09-03 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander writes: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. >> >> This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something* >> here. > We have cascading replication as a major feature, which I agree it is. > But I thi

Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2.

2012-09-03 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Make a cut at a major-features list for 9.2. > > This is open to debate of course, but it's past time we had *something* > here. (yes, i've been backlogged) We have cascading replication as a major feature, which I agree it is. But I think we s