Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Wasn't this patch rejected?
> Anyway, what is your opinion on this?
I thought we'd rejected it. I'm not sure that we'd completely agreed
what the best thing to do is, but what this patch actually does is to
silently remove the depend
Tom Lane wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> > Disallow changing/dropping default expression of a SERIAL column
>
> Wasn't this patch rejected? Your summary is utterly wrong about what
> it does, which makes me wonder whether you reviewed it at all. One
> would also think that a
