Tom Lane wrote:
> Since that was two years ago, maybe we should take another look
> and see if pkg-config has gotten better. If it hasn't evolved
> some then the answer will probably be the same though.
For all intents and purposes, pkg-config is still as broken as it ever
was. And I still have
[ redirecting to pgsql-hackers since this is not a bug ]
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> Well, I use around 10 libraries in my project, it's easier to use
>> standardized
>> methods to gather the compiler/linker options using pkg-config than c
