Re: [HACKERS] "with grant option" for user groups.

2004-01-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Potuganti Ramu wrote: > Scenario 1: > === > User A grants privilege to group B with grant option. > User C who is in group B grants privilege to user D > > If super user removes the user C from the group, then who is the > grantee for the user D? And who can revoke revoke the privileges fro

Re: [HACKERS] "with grant option" for user groups.

2004-01-09 Thread Potuganti Ramu
revoke revoke the privileges from user D? Thanks & Regards, Ramu -Original Message- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 8:11 PM To: Potuganti Ramu; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "with grant option" for user groups. > Fol

Re: [HACKERS] "with grant option" for user groups.

2004-01-09 Thread Potuganti Ramu
revoke revoke the privileges from user D? Thanks & Regards, Ramu -Original Message- From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 8:11 PM To: Potuganti Ramu; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "with grant option" for user groups. > Fol

Re: [HACKERS] "with grant option" for user groups.

2004-01-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
> Following statement says that "with grant option" is not allowed to a user > group. I would like to know what the reasons behind not implementing > this kind of feature. Consider the following sequence of steps: in database 1: user A grants privilege to group B with grant option user C who is i