Re: [HACKERS] "SMgrRelation hashtable corrupted" failure identified

2005-01-10 Thread Tom Lane
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote: >> Comments? > Only: Josh, put a hold on those press releases, looks like an RC5 is > forthcoming ... I knew you were going to say that ;-) I'm not sure if we should insist on an RC5 for this or not. If we'd

Re: [HACKERS] "SMgrRelation hashtable corrupted" failure identified

2005-01-10 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote: We've seen a few reports of the above-mentioned error message from PG 8.0 testers, but up till now no one had come up with a reproducible test case. I've now found a trivial example: session 1: create table a1 (f1 varchar(128)); session 2: insert into