Added to TODO:
* Prevent child tables from altering constraints like CHECK that were
inherited from the parent table
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Doing anything to res
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you were going to fix that by adding a column that allows me to tell
> the difference between inherited and non-inherited relations, that would
> be a very useful piece of info for partition elimination.
Inherited and non-inherited constraints you mean?
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 11:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Doing anything to restrict dropping of inherited constraints seems like
> > wasted effort and potentially annoying anyhow.
>
> Uh, why? Arguably the constraints are as much part of the parent table
>
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doing anything to restrict dropping of inherited constraints seems like
> wasted effort and potentially annoying anyhow.
Uh, why? Arguably the constraints are as much part of the parent table
definition as the columns themselves. If you had "check (f1 >
