Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > From what I can see on CPAN (unless I am missing something) DBD::PgSPI
> > hasn't been updated since 2004 and is at version 0.2.
>
> Oh, if it's not a live project then that changes things entirely.
> +1 for just dropping the ment
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From what I can see on CPAN (unless I am missing something) DBD::PgSPI
> hasn't been updated since 2004 and is at version 0.2.
Oh, if it's not a live project then that changes things entirely.
+1 for just dropping the mention.
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:45:25 -0400
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Question for plperl hackers: Should we remove the mention of
DBD::PgSPI from the PL/Perl manual?
It seems like a reasonable suggestion to
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:45:25 -0400
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Question for plperl hackers: Should we remove the mention of
> > DBD::PgSPI from the PL/Perl manual?
>
> It seems like a reasonable suggestion to me, since perl database users
