Hi,
Is it desirable for me to build Solaris 8 SPARC packages (Solaris .pkg
format) of beta5?
I have experience in doing this.
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
Database Administrator
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, clearly your looking at the bit is better than what we have now, so
> how about committing something that looks at the bit, but leave the
> default at zero. Then, let people test zero and non-zero delays and
> let's see what they find. That seems s
> Hmm. A further refinement would be to add a waiting-for-client-input
> bit to PROC, although if you have a fast-responding client, ignoring
> such backends wouldn't necessarily be a good thing. Notice that the
> pgbench transaction involves multiple client requests ...
>
> > Let's keep talkin
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, the change would have to show that doing the delay when some other
> backend has dirtied a buffer is _better_ than doing no delay.
Agreed. However, we have as yet no data that proves nonzero commit
delay is bad in the presence of multiple active ba
Scratch that... my fault, I started the wrong one. I'm getting the proper
version now.
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew
>
> FYI, I downloaded / compiled / installed beta5 and did a select version()
> from psql and got:
>
> template1=# select version();
>
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think we need to give up on the delay for 7.1.X. I don't see any
> > good/easy solutions.
>
> I take it you think my idea is not even worth trying. Why not?
You are suggesting looking at the "I have modified something" bit in
Proc, and using th
Bruce Momjian writes:
> I was wondering what open items are left? Are we ready to start the
> release process with a docs freeze?
I still have the JDBC docs to finish and someone was going to send some
PL/pgSQL stuff, but I guess I'll have to remind him again. What exactly
is the goal of a doc
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think we need to give up on the delay for 7.1.X. I don't see any
> good/easy solutions.
I take it you think my idea is not even worth trying. Why not?
regards, tom lane
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I was wondering what open items are left? Are we ready to start the
> > release process with a docs freeze?
>
> I need some feedback on my commitdelay proposal first. If we add a
> runtime parameter to control that, it had better be documented.
I
FYI, I downloaded / compiled / installed beta5 and did a select version()
from psql and got:
template1=# select version();
version
PostgreSQL 7.1beta4 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC eg
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > I was wondering what open items are left? Are we ready to start the
> > release process with a docs freeze?
>
> I still have the JDBC docs to finish and someone was going to send some
> PL/pgSQL stuff, but I guess I'll have to remind him again. What exactly
> is t
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was wondering what open items are left? Are we ready to start the
> release process with a docs freeze?
I need some feedback on my commitdelay proposal first. If we add a
runtime parameter to control that, it had better be documented.
I have a coup
>
> ... if anyone wants to take a quick gander at it while I wait to announce
> its availability ... let me know if therea re any obvious problems iwht it
> ...
I was wondering what open items are left? Are we ready to start the
release process with a docs freeze?
--
Bruce Momjian
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> ... if anyone wants to take a quick gander at it while I wait to announce
> its availability ... let me know if therea re any obvious problems iwht it
> ...
Quick note: it will be Sunday at the earliest before I can build RPM's
of beta5. If the package release is af
14 matches
Mail list logo
