Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries

2001-07-31 Thread Steve Howe
]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 8:57 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries > Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Well haven't this problem solved already ? > > I'm not sure. Steve, have you tried curr

Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries

2001-07-29 Thread Tom Lane
Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well haven't this problem solved already ? I'm not sure. Steve, have you tried current sources? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe comman

Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries

2001-07-29 Thread Hiroshi Inoue
Tom Lane wrote: > > Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Yes it's real. > > Error handling seems the cause. > > Hmm, are you working with CVS tip or 7.1.* sources? I'm wondering > how this interacts with the recent patch to #define errno as > WSAGetLastError() on WIN32... > Oops sorry

Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries

2001-07-29 Thread Tom Lane
Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes it's real. > Error handling seems the cause. Hmm, are you working with CVS tip or 7.1.* sources? I'm wondering how this interacts with the recent patch to #define errno as WSAGetLastError() on WIN32... regards, tom lane --

Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries

2001-07-27 Thread Hiroshi Inoue
Tom Lane wrote: > > "Steve Howe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is anybody trying to solve the 8191 bytes query limit from libpq > > windows port ??? > > FWIW, if the problem is real (which I still misdoubt), Yes it's real. Error handling seems the cause. When "Error: pqReadData() -- r

Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries

2001-07-27 Thread Joerg Hessdoerfer
At 01:36 27.07.2001 -0400, you wrote: >"Steve Howe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is anybody trying to solve the 8191 bytes query limit from libpq > > windows port ??? > >I think it's *your* responsibility, at least to identify what's going >on. This is an open source project, and that

Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries

2001-07-26 Thread Tom Lane
"Steve Howe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is anybody trying to solve the 8191 bytes query limit from libpq > windows port ??? I think it's *your* responsibility, at least to identify what's going on. This is an open source project, and that means you can and should fix problems that aff

RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ on Windows and large Queries

2001-07-26 Thread Khoa Do
I'm surprised you are even able to run postgres in windows. I didn't even know postgres supported windows. Could you kindly point me to instructions on how to run it and build the postgres souce on windows? If nobody will try to fix it, then maybe we should just try it ourseleves and po