> Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom, do you have a plan to make a back patch for 7.0.3?
>
> No, I don't. No time for it now.
>
> > I got a bug report from a user with a script to reproduce the
> > problem. Seems the backend consumes infinite memory.
>
> Not infinite, surely ;-)
Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom, do you have a plan to make a back patch for 7.0.3?
No, I don't. No time for it now.
> I got a bug report from a user with a script to reproduce the
> problem. Seems the backend consumes infinite memory.
Not infinite, surely ;-) ... but possibly m
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> If you like I'll post the patch, but it strikes me as a waste of list
> >> bandwidth --- anyone who is likely to actually review it is perfectly
> >> capable of doing cvs diff for themselves ...
>
> > Posting patch is only useful if you want people
"Mikheev, Vadim" wrote:
>
> > > Also, is TOAST-table vacuuming fixed now?
> >
> > Still broken. Hiroshi had muttered something about fixing
> > the internal commit of VACUUM so that it's more like a real
> > commit --- including advancing the transaction ID --- but
> > still doesn't release the e
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 03:20:27PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> > > It seems that Tom has committed his fixups but we're still waiting
> > > on Vadim?
> >
> > Sorry guys, I'm busy with WAL issues currently.
> > CRC will require initdb, so it's
> > Sorry guys, I'm busy with WAL issues currently.
> > CRC will require initdb, so it's better to implement it
> > first...
> > Also, is TOAST-table vacuuming fixed now?
>
> Can someone please remind me? CRC allows us to know of WAL log is
> corrupt?
Currently WAL has no means to know is log d
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> If you like I'll post the patch, but it strikes me as a waste of list
> >> bandwidth --- anyone who is likely to actually review it is perfectly
> >> capable of doing cvs diff for themselves ...
>
> > Posting patch is only useful if you want people
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> > It seems that Tom has committed his fixups but we're still waiting
> > on Vadim?
>
> Sorry guys, I'm busy with WAL issues currently.
> CRC will require initdb, so it's better to implement it
> first...
> Also, is TOAST-table vacuuming fixed no
> > Also, is TOAST-table vacuuming fixed now?
>
> Still broken. Hiroshi had muttered something about fixing
> the internal commit of VACUUM so that it's more like a real
> commit --- including advancing the transaction ID --- but
> still doesn't release the exclusive lock held by VACUUM.
> Basi
* Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001215 10:34] wrote:
> >
> > sorry, meant to respond to the original and deleted it too fast ...
> >
> > Tom, if the difference between 7.0 and 7.1 is such that there is a
> > performance decrease, *please* apply the fix ... with the boon that OUTER
> > JOIN
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If you like I'll post the patch, but it strikes me as a waste of list
>> bandwidth --- anyone who is likely to actually review it is perfectly
>> capable of doing cvs diff for themselves ...
> Posting patch is only useful if you want people to review i
> It seems that Tom has committed his fixups but we're still waiting
> on Vadim?
Sorry guys, I'm busy with WAL issues currently.
CRC will require initdb, so it's better to implement it
first...
Also, is TOAST-table vacuuming fixed now?
Vadim
"Mikheev, Vadim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, is TOAST-table vacuuming fixed now?
Still broken. Hiroshi had muttered something about fixing the internal
commit of VACUUM so that it's more like a real commit --- including
advancing the transaction ID --- but still doesn't release the exclu
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001215 10:34] wrote:
> > >
> > > sorry, meant to respond to the original and deleted it too fast ...
> > >
> > > Tom, if the difference between 7.0 and 7.1 is such that there is a
> > > performance decrease, *p
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Totally agree. In the old days, we posted all our patches to the list
> so people could see. We used to make cvs commits only on the main
> server, so we had the patch handy, and it made sense to post it. Now
> that we have remote cvs, we don't do it
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Totally agree. In the old days, we posted all our patches to the list
> > so people could see. We used to make cvs commits only on the main
> > server, so we had the patch handy, and it made sense to post it. Now
> > that we have remote cvs, we do
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you're saying that you're OK with the work Vadim has done please
> let him know, I'm assuming he hasn't committed out of respect for your
> still standing objection.
Well, I'm still against committing it now, but I only have one core
vote, and I s
sorry, meant to respond to the original and deleted it too fast ...
Tom, if the difference between 7.0 and 7.1 is such that there is a
performance decrease, *please* apply the fix ... with the boon that OUTER
JOINs will provide, would hate to see us with a performance hit reducing
that impact .
* Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001213 15:18] wrote:
>
> I'm trying to resist the temptation to make this change right now :-).
> It's not quite a bug fix --- well, maybe you could call it a performance
> bug fix --- so I'm kind of thinking it shouldn't be done during beta.
> OTOH I seem to have
19 matches
Mail list logo
