Re: [HACKERS] A post-7.1 wish-list.

2001-01-11 Thread XuYifeng
> > > Another "obvious solution" (delegating the use of the thesaurus to the > > > client application) is also a non-solution : how do you join your data > > > and the thesaurus data ? > > > > The usual way as in any relational data base: by referencing the information. > > That makes the client

Re: [HACKERS] A post-7.1 wish-list.

2001-01-10 Thread Tom Samplonius
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Manuel Cabido wrote: > I would like to inquire if in the next release of postgresql the database > will have to be compacted into a single file like what Interbase > database supports? I find this feature convenient because it will simplify > the updating of your database con

RE: [HACKERS] A post-7.1 wish-list.

2001-01-10 Thread Andrew Snow
> I'd try my hand at it, given enough time ... which I'm awfully short on. > Which is one of my reasons to have that feature : not having to do grunt > work. It should only take a few seconds to write such rules for simple views -- see the examples in the Programmer documentation. /programmer/ru

Re: [HACKERS] A post-7.1 wish-list.

2001-01-10 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Emmanuel Charpentier writes: > > > 1) Updatable views. > > You can make rules updateable by attaching appropriate rules to them. > The transparent implementation of updateable views would essentially do > that. It's a planned feature but I don't know of anyone who h

Re: [HACKERS] A post-7.1 wish-list.

2001-01-10 Thread Manuel Cabido
I would like to inquire if in the next release of postgresql the database will have to be compacted into a single file like what Interbase database supports? I find this feature convenient because it will simplify the updating of your database considering that you will be dealing only with one si

Re: [HACKERS] A post-7.1 wish-list.

2001-01-10 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Horst Herb wrote: > > On Sunday 07 January 2001 21:31, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: [ ... ] > Excuse me, but where has MS Access competence? It is a pretty useless data > lottery with an admittedly very capable & easy user interface. The odds of > data corruption can't possibly be higher with an

Re: [HACKERS] A post-7.1 wish-list.

2001-01-07 Thread Horst Herb
On Sunday 07 January 2001 21:31, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > These advances will allow me to use PostgreSQL for some work I had to do > until now with (gasp !) MS-Access (which has poor performance but good > competence). And get rid of the damn MS-Windows envoronment for good ! Excuse me, but

Re: [HACKERS] A post-7.1 wish-list.

2001-01-07 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Emmanuel Charpentier writes: > 1) Updatable views. You can make rules updateable by attaching appropriate rules to them. The transparent implementation of updateable views would essentially do that. It's a planned feature but I don't know of anyone who has made it his priority. > 2) External d