Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> I find that two geometry 'expected' files are now sufficient to cover
>> all the platforms I have available to test. (We'd only need one, if
>> everyone displayed minus zero as '-0', but some platforms print '0'.)
> Judging from t
Tom Lane writes:
> I find that two geometry 'expected' files are now sufficient to cover
> all the platforms I have available to test. (We'd only need one, if
> everyone displayed minus zero as '-0', but some platforms print '0'.)
Judging from the platforms affected by this, I would suspect that
Tom Lane wrote:
"Pedro M. Ferreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[ patch for extra_float_digits ]
I've applied this patch along with followup changes to pg_dump (it sets
extra_float_digits to 2 to allow accurate dump/reload) and the geometry
regression test (it sets extra_float_digits to -3).
"Pedro M. Ferreira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ patch for extra_float_digits ]
I've applied this patch along with followup changes to pg_dump (it sets
extra_float_digits to 2 to allow accurate dump/reload) and the geometry
regression test (it sets extra_float_digits to -3).
I find that two ge
