Re: Fwd: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan

2008-02-11 Thread Robert Treat
On Monday 11 February 2008 18:18, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Andy Colson wrote: > >> Would a pre-requisite for any new SCM to be anointed as *the* new SCM > >> that the buildfarm can be reconfigured to run with it? Unless there > >> is an SCM2CVS option available I suppose... how many SCM's support >

Re: Fwd: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan

2008-02-11 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Andy Colson wrote: Would a pre-requisite for any new SCM to be anointed as *the* new SCM that the buildfarm can be reconfigured to run with it? Unless there is an SCM2CVS option available I suppose... how many SCM's support such a thing? I dont think the buildfarm needs to require CVS.

Re: Fwd: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan

2008-02-11 Thread Christopher Browne
On Feb 11, 2008 9:14 PM, Andy Colson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I dont think the buildfarm needs to require CVS. The code can be > changed in the buildfarm to just run 'svn up' or 'git up and go' (sorry, > never used git so I had to guess at the command :-) ) right? The relevant commands, for

Re: Fwd: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan

2008-02-11 Thread Mark Mielke
Andy Colson wrote: Robert Treat wrote: Would a pre-requisite for any new SCM to be anointed as *the* new SCM that the buildfarm can be reconfigured to run with it? Unless there is an SCM2CVS option available I suppose... how many SCM's support such a thing? I dont think the buildfarm needs

Re: Fwd: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan

2008-02-11 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Andy Colson escribió: > Robert Treat wrote: >> Would a pre-requisite for any new SCM to be anointed as *the* new SCM >> that the buildfarm can be reconfigured to run with it? Unless there is >> an SCM2CVS option available I suppose... how many SCM's support such a >> thing? > > I dont think t

Re: Fwd: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan

2008-02-11 Thread Andy Colson
Robert Treat wrote: On Saturday 09 February 2008 22:51, Christopher Browne wrote: On Feb 9, 2008 4:58 PM, Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I wonder if the efforts to provide mirrors for many different systems can hurt later down the road. It is pretty obvious that amost every current system

Re: Fwd: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan

2008-02-11 Thread Robert Treat
On Saturday 09 February 2008 22:51, Christopher Browne wrote: > On Feb 9, 2008 4:58 PM, Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I wonder if the efforts to provide mirrors for many different systems can > > hurt later down the road. It is pretty obvious that amost every current > > system has optio

Fwd: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan

2008-02-09 Thread Christopher Browne
On Feb 9, 2008 4:58 PM, Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wonder if the efforts to provide mirrors for many different systems can > hurt later down the road. It is pretty obvious that amost every current > system has options to convert from or to mirror a CVS repository. But what if > we