Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Seems we need to resolve this before beta2.
>
> Not really. It's just a bug; we have others.
Oh, it doesn't effect initdb?
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Seems we need to resolve this before beta2.
Not really. It's just a bug; we have others.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
h
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Seems we need to resolve this before beta2.
I'd go with making the NUMERIC default precision 16 for v7.3, so
we are backwards compatible on this release (except that it is
now a predictable 16 digit precision instead of an hardware
implementation dependent one).
For v7.
Seems we need to resolve this before beta2.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > One problem is, that division already has an inherently inexact
> > result. Do you intend to rip that out too while
