Zeugswetter Andreas SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't know, but imho one field for all permissions would have been
> better, like we discussed for the permissions system table, since
> there are more rights in SQL than read/write (e.g. write is separated
> into insert, update and delete)
N
Sorry for the late reply, but I was on vacation (my 2. daughter was born).
> After looking at the rule rewriter some more, I realized that the only
> way to push all permissions checks to execution time is not
> only to keep
> skipAcl, but to generalize it. The problem is with checks on the vie
