Zeugswetter Andreas SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has anybody done performance and reliability tests with CRC64 ?
> I think it must be a CPU eater. It looks a lot more complex than a CRC32.
On my box (PA-RISC) the inner loop is about 14 cycles/byte, vs. about
7 cycles/byte for CRC32. On alm
> > 1. Under "RELIABILITY/MISC", add:
> >
> > Write out a CRC with each data block, and verify it on reading.
> TODO updated. I know we did number 2, but did we agree on #1 and is it
> done?
Has anybody done performance and reliability tests with CRC64 ?
I think it must be a CPU eater. It
