> >> But you don't really need to look at the index (if it even exists
> >> at the time you do the ANALYZE). The extent to which the data is
> >> ordered in the table is a property of the table, not the index.
>
> > Think compound, ascending, descending and functional index.
> > The (let's call
Zeugswetter Andreas SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But you don't really need to look at the index (if it even exists
>> at the time you do the ANALYZE). The extent to which the data is
>> ordered in the table is a property of the table, not the index.
> Think compound, ascending, descending
> But you don't really need to look at the index (if it even exists
> at the time you do the ANALYZE). The extent to which the data is
> ordered in the table is a property of the table, not the index.
Think compound, ascending, descending and functional index.
The (let's call it) cluster statis
