AW: [HACKERS] Please advise features in 7.1 (SUMMARY)

2000-11-28 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas SB
> > So, having _both_ is the best thing. > > Absolutely, that's always what I meant -- we already have views and views > can do this type of stuff at SELECT time can't they? So it's not a change, > just an addition And the precalculated and stored on disk thing can be done with triggers. A

AW: [HACKERS] Please advise features in 7.1 (SUMMARY)

2000-11-28 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas SB
> I guess it depends on what you're using it for -- disk space > is cheap and > abundant anymore, I can see some advantages of having it > computed only once > rather than X times, where X is the number of SELECTs as that > could get > costly on really high traffic servers.. Costly not so much

AW: [HACKERS] Please advise features in 7.1 (SUMMARY)

2000-11-28 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas SB
> > This is a summary of replies. > > > > 1. Calculated fields in table definitions . eg. > > > > Create table test ( > > A Integer, > > B integer, > > the_sum As (A+B), > > ); > > > > This functionality can be achieved through the use of views. >

Re: AW: [HACKERS] Please advise features in 7.1

2000-11-23 Thread Don Baccus
At 12:28 PM 11/23/00 +0100, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote: > >> Reason: I want to know if any of these features are scheduled. >> >> 1. Calculated fields in table definitions . eg. >> >>Create table test ( >> A Integer, >> B integer, >>the_sum As (A+B),

AW: [HACKERS] Please advise features in 7.1

2000-11-23 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas SB
> Reason: I want to know if any of these features are scheduled. > > 1. Calculated fields in table definitions . eg. > >Create table test ( > A Integer, > B integer, >the_sum As (A+B), > ); This is currently easily done with a procedure that takes a t