AW: AW: [HACKERS] "setuid" functions, a solution to the RI privilege problem

2000-09-18 Thread Zeugswetter Andreas SB
> But the pg_shadow authentication is based on credentials > provided by the > client whereas what you propose here would run on the server, so this > doesn't make sense. Since you can write extensions to PostgreSQL that reach far into the OS, it does make sense to execute those extensions und

Re: AW: [HACKERS] "setuid" functions, a solution to the RI privilege problem

2000-09-17 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Zeugswetter Andreas SB writes: > Imho it is fine to get rid of the usesysid in our internal > authorization system, but we should not get rid of the only field that > can tie a db user to an os user. Imho we should not do a "by name" > lookup and eliminate the field. Um, well, the only possible