Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I am digging through the code looking at this, and I have a question. As
>> far as I can tell, there is currently no owner for a pg_language entry.
Er, doh.
> Sort of answered my own question, found this comment:
> * Note: for now, languages are treat
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Jeremy Drake wrote:
> I am digging through the code looking at this, and I have a question. As
> far as I can tell, there is currently no owner for a pg_language entry.
> Is this correct or is ownership information stored somewhere other than
> the pg_language relation? Are
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
> [ redirecting thread from -patches to -hackers for wider comment ]
>
> Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Note I'm not arguing against allowing it to be "on" by default, I just
> >> want to be sure there is
[ redirecting thread from -patches to -hackers for wider comment ]
Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Note I'm not arguing against allowing it to be "on" by default, I just
>> want to be sure there is a way for paranoid DBAs to turn it off. Maybe
>>
