Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status

2004-06-08 Thread George Weaver
D]> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 6:52 AM Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status > > > I will look at c) unless someone comes up with a better idea > > or someone else gets in first. > > That would be great. Grab a hold of the cygwin sources

Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status

2004-02-24 Thread Andrew Dunstan
George Weaver wrote: I'm not sure of the detail behind winsup/cygwin/localtime.cc, but there are problems with how Cygwin handles dates and times on Windows. See http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-07/msg01016.html. If there is any relevance, I think it is imperative that the Win32 version of Po

Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status

2004-02-24 Thread Claudio Natoli
> > I will look at c) unless someone comes up with a better idea > > or someone else gets in first. > > That would be great. Grab a hold of the cygwin sources. > winsup/cygwin/localtime.cc claims that it is in the public > domain... needs a closer look that I've given it, but might be a > goo

Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status

2004-02-24 Thread Claudio Natoli
> I will look at c) unless someone comes up with a better idea > or someone else gets in first. That would be great. Grab a hold of the cygwin sources. winsup/cygwin/localtime.cc claims that it is in the public domain... needs a closer look that I've given it, but might be a good starting point.