Rosser Schwarz wrote:
> while you weren't looking, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Adjustments?
>
> A couple slight tweaks and rephrasings:
>
> If you're looking for a PostgreSQL gatekeeper, central committe or
> controlling company, give up; there isn't one. We do have a core
> committe and don't ha
Dave Held wrote:
> > developers and users of PostgreSQL. Everyone is welcome to
> > subscribe and take part in the discussions. (See the
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ_DEV.html";>
> > Developer's FAQ for information on how to get
> > involved in PostgreSQL develo
Dave Held wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 7:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Dave Held; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS:
Increased
company
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 7:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Dave Held; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS:
Robert Treat said:
>> * Engage the community by participating in discussions and patch
>> reviews - your credibility as a contributor depends on your
>> willingness to contribute to the community in non-coding
>> ways as well
>
> Actually I think Bruces blurb is good for the general FA
On Monday 02 May 2005 17:32, Dave Held wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 3:33 PM
> > To: Dave Held
> > Cc: PostgreSQL advocacy; PostgreSQL-development
> > Subject: Re: [pgsql-
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 1:50 PM
> To: josh@agliodbs.com
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; Marc G. Fournier; PostgreSQL advocacy; Dave Held;
> PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS]
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 3:33 PM
> To: Dave Held
> Cc: PostgreSQL advocacy; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS:
> Increased
> company invol
while you weren't looking, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Adjustments?
A couple slight tweaks and rephrasings:
If you're looking for a PostgreSQL gatekeeper, central committe or
controlling company, give up; there isn't one. We do have a core
committe and don't hand out CVS commit privileges like candy,
while you weren't looking, I wrote:
[...]
Gah. s/committe/committee/
/rls
--
:wq
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Dave Held wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 1:21 PM
> > To: Bruce Momjian
> > Cc: Marc G. Fournier; PostgreSQL advocacy; Dave Held;
> > PostgreSQL-development
> > Subjec
Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus writes:
> > As you've already observed, if Tom doesn't like something it's very
> > unlikely
> > to get through.
>
> I lose my share of arguments --- in fact, in the twenty minutes since
> your posting I already notice Bruce committing a patch I had objected to
> ;
On Monday 02 May 2005 14:49, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> > > (P.S. on a complete tangent, "call a spade a spade" is actually a
> > > racist expression originating in the reconstruction-era South.
> > > "spade" does
> >
> > You must be from California. :-)
>
> Well, yes. Actually, from San
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Dave,
>
> > Well, I never said that core runs around saving the world. I
> > mostly made the point that core developers have special
> > influence,
>
> Yep. Absolutely. I wanted to point out to you that core isn't the only
> group within PostgreSQL that has special infl
Dave,
> Well, I never said that core runs around saving the world. I
> mostly made the point that core developers have special
> influence,
Yep. Absolutely. I wanted to point out to you that core isn't the only
group within PostgreSQL that has special influence.
> Which is also something t
Dave Held wrote:
[...]
(P.S. on a complete tangent, "call a spade a spade" is
actually a racist expression originating in the
reconstruction-era South. "spade" does not mean garden tool
but is a derogatory slang term for black people.
[...]
Interesting. Duly noted.
It would be interesti
Josh Berkus writes:
> As you've already observed, if Tom doesn't like something it's very unlikely
> to get through.
I lose my share of arguments --- in fact, in the twenty minutes since
your posting I already notice Bruce committing a patch I had objected to
;-).
Our process is not "democratic
Bruce,
> > (P.S. on a complete tangent, "call a spade a spade" is actually a racist
> > expression originating in the reconstruction-era South. "spade" does
>
> You must be from California. :-)
Well, yes. Actually, from San Francisco, which is even worse.And I just
spent the weekend in
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 1:21 PM
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: Marc G. Fournier; PostgreSQL advocacy; Dave Held;
> PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] Decision Proc
On Mon, 2 May 2005, Josh Berkus wrote:
As you've already observed, if Tom doesn't like something it's very unlikely
to get through.
One thing to note on this one ... I've never seen Tom *not* try and help
the submitter to get the code up to spec either ... he's always bent over
backwards to try a
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2005, Josh Berkus wrote:
As you've already observed, if Tom doesn't like something it's very
unlikely
to get through.
One thing to note on this one ... I've never seen Tom *not* try and help
the submitter to get the code up to spec either ... he's always ben
Dave,
> The group has moderators, but they exist only
> to moderate discussion on the mailing lists. I'm not saying that
> it is bad that Postgres is not democratic. Postgres is a totally
> different kind of beast than Boost, and probably benefits from
> having a few people ultimately decide its
22 matches
Mail list logo
