Am Freitag, 25. August 2006 17:17 schrieb Enver ALTIN:
> Am I the only one who believes that PostgreSQL project is not supposed
> to fix (or include workarounds for) some other systems that actually
> don't work very well?
Yes.
> If NFS is causing trouble, let it be.
NFS is not the trouble.
--
Merhaba,
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 10:30:56AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> It is extremely careful. The point is that the NFS mount will hide the
> existing datadir from initdb.
Am I the only one who believes that PostgreSQL project is not supposed
to fix (or include workarounds for) some other
Sander Steffann wrote:
Hi,
If this were a bulletproof solution then I'd consider it anyway, but
AFAICS it's got the very same vulnerabilities as the flag-file method,
ie, if you RPM install or upgrade while your mountable data directory
is offline, you can still get screwed.
Isn't th
Hi,
> If this were a bulletproof solution then I'd consider it anyway, but
> AFAICS it's got the very same vulnerabilities as the flag-file method,
> ie, if you RPM install or upgrade while your mountable data directory
> is offline, you can still get screwed.
Isn't the most bulletproof solution
