Billy G. Allie writes:
> I disagree that it's a new feature. The code to add the -rpath (-R) option
> was already there. My patch made it more useful in that the additional search
> libraries are now placed in the -rpath (-R) option.
Yeah, you're doing additional things, so it's a new feature.
Patch applied to 7.3 and CVS, with Tom's correction.
---
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Here is diff. Please let me know if you need better wording.
>
>
>
> --On Thursday, November 07, 2002 16:50:26 -0600 Larry Rosenman
> <[EM
I will deal with it when I apply.
---
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Do y'all want a new diff, or can you deal with it when you do the patch?
>
> LER
>
>
> --On Friday, November 08, 2002 09:45:44 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Do y'all want a new diff, or can you deal with it when you do the patch?
LER
--On Friday, November 08, 2002 09:45:44 -0500 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
+For compilers earlier than the one released with OpenUNIX 8.0.0(UnixWare
+7.1.2), Includin
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +For compilers earlier than the one released with OpenUNIX 8.0.0(UnixWare
> +7.1.2), Including the 7.1.1b Feature Supplement, you may need to specify -Xb
> + in CFLAGS or the CC environment variable. The indication of this is an
> +error in compiling t
Here is diff. Please let me know if you need better wording.
--On Thursday, November 07, 2002 16:50:26 -0600 Larry Rosenman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, I'll try and do up a diff to B5's tonite (probably late, my
Daughter's elementary school honors choir has a performance tonite).
LER
--
IL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Billy G. Allie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a
>
>
>
> --On Thursday, November 07, 2002
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > I am fine with this because it only touches unixware-specific stuff,
>
> This is an entirely new feature, so it's inappropriate to do now. And if
> we do it, we should do it for all platforms.
I disagree that it's a new feature. The code to
OK, I'll try and do up a diff to B5's tonite (probably late, my Daughter's
elementary school honors choir has a performance tonite).
LER
--On Thursday, November 07, 2002 17:44:37 -0500 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
His updates deal only with the LDLIBRARY path issue, which I think
His updates deal only with the LDLIBRARY path issue, which I think we
are keeping for 7.4:
*** ./doc/FAQ_SCO.orig Wed Nov 6 21:35:46 2002
--- ./doc/FAQ_SCO Wed Nov 6 21:40:44 2002
***
*** 71,76
--- 71,79
configure --with-libs=/usr/local/lib --with-includes=/usr
With or withou Billie's update(s)?
(I haven't looked at them)
LER
--On Thursday, November 07, 2002 17:08:04 -0500 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We do point to the FAQ_SCO file for specifics. Would you send a diff
for that file?
---
We do point to the FAQ_SCO file for specifics. Would you send a diff
for that file?
---
Larry Rosenman wrote:
> For compilers earlier than the one released with OpenUNIX 8.0.0(UnixWare
> 7.1.2), Including
> the 7.1.1b Feat
For compilers earlier than the one released with OpenUNIX 8.0.0(UnixWare
7.1.2), Including
the 7.1.1b Feature Supplement, you may need to specify -Xb in CFLAGS or the
CC environment
variable.
--On Thursday, November 07, 2002 16:34:12 -0500 Tom Lane
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Larry Rosenman <
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It DOES compile out of the box now on 8.0.0(7.1.2) and 7.1.3. Apparently a
> compiler
> fix between the 7.1.1b FS and 7.1.2.
Well, this is what the REMARKS column is for in the supported-platform
list. Seems we need a comment like "for older compiler
--On Thursday, November 07, 2002 22:21:56 +0100 Peter Eisentraut
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Olivier PRENANT writes:
I don't mind having CFLAGS=-Xb though, done it for php already...
By everyone says this should go off so..
The idea of the platform testing is not to determine whether you ca
Bruce Momjian writes:
> I am fine with this because it only touches unixware-specific stuff,
This is an entirely new feature, so it's inappropriate to do now. And if
we do it, we should do it for all platforms.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadc
Olivier PRENANT writes:
> I don't mind having CFLAGS=-Xb though, done it for php already...
> By everyone says this should go off so..
The idea of the platform testing is not to determine whether you can
compile PostgreSQL after performing a secret dance. If it doesn't compile
with the default
Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Billy G. Allie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and
a
cc -O -g -I../../../../src/include -I/
TED]>, Billy G. Allie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a
>
> cc -O -g -I../../../../src/include -I/usr/local/include -c -o tuplesort.o
> tuplesort.c
> UX:cc: WARNING: d
y Rosenman wrote:
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 10:37:36 -0600
From: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Billy G. Allie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported
CTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Billy G. Allie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a
>
> It **LOOKS** right. I'm abo
TECTED]>
Cc: Billy G. Allie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and
a
It **LOOKS** right. I'm about to double check it on 7.1.3.
Olivier, is this the 7.1.1b FS Compiler?
I wonder if
Billy G. Allie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and
a
Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> *WHAT??**
> this directory has hust been created by de-taring
> postgresql-7.3b
IL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Billy G. Allie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a
>
> Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
om Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Billy G. Allie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a
>
> It looks like you do **NOT** have B4 or B5
>
> LER
>
>
>
Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> *WHAT??**
> this directory has hust been created by de-taring postgresql-7.3b5.tar.gz
> from my own mirror dated nov 6 20:04...
Well, there's something darn weird here. Is
src/backend/utils/sort/tuplesort.c version 1.28 or 1.29? At line 1838,
do you
]
> Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a
>
> Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Huh! I just tried to compile 7.3b5 without CFLAGS=-Xb, it still bugs the
> > compiler...
>
> It won't get better if you don't sh
rry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Billy G. Allie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and
a
Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Huh! I just tried to compile 7.3b5 withou
, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a
>> Tom fixed that with a later tuplesort.c fix (per a discussion with the
>> Caldera/SCO
>> compiler guys).
> Huh! I just tried to compile 7.3b5 without C
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 08:41:58 -0600
> From: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Billy G. Allie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS]
Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Huh! I just tried to compile 7.3b5 without CFLAGS=-Xb, it still bugs the
> compiler...
It won't get better if you don't show any details...
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a
--On Thursday, November 07, 2002 13:32:18 +0100 Olivier PRENANT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's true!
>
> But I had to export CFLAGS=-Xb to compile (this
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 06:41:02 -0600
> From: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Billy G. Allie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS]
TECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a
patch.
We already have success messages from Olivier Prenant for 7.3B4 on
8.0.0, and me for 7.1.3.
I don't believe your changes are necessary.
--On Wednesday, November 06, 2002 22:57:
;
> To: Billy G. Allie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PORTS] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL supported platform report and a
> patch.
>
> We already have success messages from Olivier Prenant for 7.3B4 on 8.0.0,
> and me for 7.1.3
35 matches
Mail list logo
