Hannes Eder wrote:
(a) use the current dir "." instead of "../.." for the *.sample files,
since there are the chdir's to ../../.. resp. to ../../../.. in line
28 resp. 29. Using ../.. would traverse a too large part of the
directory structure.
Actually, it should be restricted more, to sr
Magnus Hagander schrieb:
Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I have committed a fix that is somewhat similar to this. The Install.pm
module needs some love, but that will have to wait till the next cycle.
Thanks, Andrew!
Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I have committed a fix that is somewhat similar to this. The Install.pm
module needs some love, but that will have to wait till the next cycle.
Thanks, Andrew!
Guys, would you comment
Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> I have committed a fix that is somewhat similar to this. The Install.pm
>>> module needs some love, but that will have to wait till the next cycle.
>
>> Thanks, Andrew!
>
> Guys, would you comment on whethe
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I have committed a fix that is somewhat similar to this. The Install.pm
>> module needs some love, but that will have to wait till the next cycle.
> Thanks, Andrew!
Guys, would you comment on whether this patch closes all the
Magnus Hagander schrieb:
I used to have a different patch from Andrew that did part of this, and
more, and conflicted rather badly with it. However, I never got around
to applying that one, and I can't seem to find it anymore.
Andrew -do you recall if you had all this in yours, and is it still
s
I am fighting some fires in my day job.
My pesonal TODO list for pg up to beta is:
. fix chunking muddle (see recent emails)
. complete CSV logs patch
. harden MSVC builds
I'll get to this when I can. I can dig up the patch I did if you want
it again.
cheers
andrew
Magnus Hagander wrote
I used to have a different patch from Andrew that did part of this, and
more, and conflicted rather badly with it. However, I never got around
to applying that one, and I can't seem to find it anymore.
Andrew -do you recall if you had all this in yours, and is it still
something you want in, or sh
Magnus, what is your reaction to this patch?
---
Hannes Eder wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >Hannes Eder wrote:
> >> Is it worth doing this the "Perl-way" and using File::Find? If so, I
> can
> >> work an a patch for
