Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved

2005-07-16 Thread Tom Lane
Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > consider what would happen if the shared library didn't exist at all and > only a static version were available. Until this recent batch of pgcrypto > changes everything built fine. Well, the right answer to that really is that pgcrypto ought not try to

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] 4 pgcrypto regressions failures - 1 unsolved

2005-07-16 Thread Kris Jurka
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote: > Kris Jurka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The link line says -L/usr/local/lib -lz and libz.a is in /usr/local/lib > > while libz.so is in /usr/lib. > > Well, that is a flat-out configuration error on the local sysadmin's > part. I can't think of any