On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Scott Bailey wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Jan Urbański
>> wrote:
>>> [ detailed review ]
>>
>> Arie,
>>
>> Are you planning to submit an updated patch? If so, please do so soon.
>>
> What is the time limit on this? I've been te
Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Jan Urbański wrote:
[ detailed review ]
Arie,
Are you planning to submit an updated patch? If so, please do so soon.
Thanks,
...Robert
What is the time limit on this? I've been testing Arie's patch and I
want to see it get in. I can m
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Jan Urbański wrote:
> [ detailed review ]
Arie,
Are you planning to submit an updated patch? If so, please do so soon.
Thanks,
...Robert
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.po
Hi,
here's a review of the patch:
It applies with offsets, but worked fine for me. It works as advertised,
and I believe it is a solid step forward from the current situation.
As far as the coding goes, the PG_TRY/CATCH in xml_xmlpathobjtoxmltype
seems unnecessary in the XPATH_BOOLEAN branch, as
Arie Bikker wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On ons, 2010-01-06 at 23:46 +0100, Arie Bikker wrote:
Hope this is the right attachement type (I'm new at this)
BTW. here a some nice examples:
- Get the number of attributes of the first childnode:
select ( xpath('count(@*)',(xpath('*[1]','g="j"/>
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On ons, 2010-01-06 at 23:46 +0100, Arie Bikker wrote:
Hope this is the right attachement type (I'm new at this)
BTW. here a some nice examples:
- Get the number of attributes of the first childnode:
select ( xpath('count(@*)',(xpath('*[1]','g="j"/>'))[1]))[1];
- an
On ons, 2010-01-06 at 23:46 +0100, Arie Bikker wrote:
> Hope this is the right attachement type (I'm new at this)
> BTW. here a some nice examples:
>
> - Get the number of attributes of the first childnode:
>
> select ( xpath('count(@*)',(xpath('*[1]',' g="j"/>'))[1]))[1];
>
> - an alternative f
Arie Bikker wrote:
Sorry for the previous NUUUB post, didn't now the mailing list doesn't
support html ;(
Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Arie Bikker wrote:
Hi all,
Well I had to burn some midnight oil trying to figure out why a
construct
like
SELECT xpath('name()',''
Sorry for the previous NUUUB post, didn't now the mailing list doesn't
support html ;(
Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Arie Bikker wrote:
Hi all,
Well I had to burn some midnight oil trying to figure out why a construct
like
SELECT xpath('name()','');
doesn't give the e
Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Arie Bikker wrote:
Hi all,
Well I had to burn some midnight oil trying to figure out why a construct
like
SELECT xpath('name()','');
doesn't give the expected result. Kept getting an empty array:
xpath
-
{}
instead
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Arie Bikker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Well I had to burn some midnight oil trying to figure out why a construct
> like
> SELECT xpath('name()','');
> doesn't give the expected result. Kept getting an empty array:
> xpath
> -
> {}
> instead of the expected "
Arie Bikker wrote:
Hi all,
Well I had to burn some midnight oil trying to figure out why a
construct like
SELECT xpath('name()','');
doesn't give the expected result. Kept getting an empty array:
xpath
-
{}
instead of the expected "{a}"
BugID 4294 and the TODO item "better handl
Hi all,
Well I had to burn some midnight oil trying to figure out why a
construct like
SELECT xpath('name()','');
doesn't give the expected result. Kept getting an empty array:
xpath
-
{}
instead of the expected "{a}"
BugID 4294 and the TODO item "better handling of XPath data ty
13 matches
Mail list logo
