On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 00:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Are you sufficiently excited about it to fix its memory management
> issues?
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 09:12 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Given your interest in XML2, would you like to be come a maintainer of
> the module?
I'm wonderfully flattered b
> (4) In conclusion, I hope that PostgreSQL will keep xml2
> or something similar even when the XSLT and speculative parsing
> issues have been addressed.
Given your interest in XML2, would you like to be come a maintainer of
the module?
--Josh Berkus
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pg
"J. Greg Davidson" writes:
> (4) In conclusion, I hope that PostgreSQL will keep xml2
> or something similar even when the XSLT and speculative parsing
> issues have been addressed.
Are you sufficiently excited about it to fix its memory management
issues?
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-i
Reporting as requested, there are two things our projects
continue to need xml2 for, and a third which we conceptually
need xml2 for:
(1) We need some way to do xslt processing.
(2) We need the equivalent of xml_is_well_formed(text), e.g.
a documented way to call XMLPARSE speculatively and get a
