Re: [HACKERS] xlog min recovery request ... is past current point ...

2012-03-05 Thread Robert Haas
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Hmm, I think I see how that can happen: > > 0. A heap page has its bit set in visibility map to begin with > > 1. A heap tuple is inserted/updated/deleted. This clears the VM bit. > 2. time passes, and more WAL is generated > 3. The page

Re: [HACKERS] xlog min recovery request ... is past current point ...

2012-03-04 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 03.02.2012 18:32, Christophe Pettus wrote: PostgreSQL 9.0.4: While bringing up a streaming replica, and while it is working its way through the WAL segments before connecting to the primary, I see a lot of messages of the form: 2012-02-01 21:26:13.978 PST,,,24448,,4f2a1e61.5f80,54,,2012-02

[HACKERS] xlog min recovery request ... is past current point ...

2012-02-03 Thread Christophe Pettus
PostgreSQL 9.0.4: While bringing up a streaming replica, and while it is working its way through the WAL segments before connecting to the primary, I see a lot of messages of the form: 2012-02-01 21:26:13.978 PST,,,24448,,4f2a1e61.5f80,54,,2012-02-01 21:25:53 PST,1/0,0,LOG,0,"restored log