Re: [HACKERS] xReader, double-effort

2012-04-27 Thread Greg Smith
On 04/27/2012 06:48 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote: That's largely my fault. It may not have come out that way, but I was trying more to point out the complexity of the story rather than assign blame. I find it hard to point at any obvious "don't do that again" target here. -- Greg Smith 2ndQu

Re: [HACKERS] xReader, double-effort

2012-04-27 Thread Kevin Grittner
Greg Smith wrote: > On 04/26/2012 12:57 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> I don't recall seeing any previous postings about the 2Q project, >> either. We should try to keep these discussions on-list. > > First brought up two months ago to the list it seemed most > relevant to at the time: > http://arch

Re: [HACKERS] xReader, double-effort

2012-04-27 Thread Greg Smith
On 04/26/2012 12:57 PM, Robert Haas wrote: I don't recall seeing any previous postings about the 2Q project, either. We should try to keep these discussions on-list. First brought up two months ago to the list it seemed most relevant to at the time: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-clust

Re: [HACKERS] xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)

2012-04-27 Thread Aakash Goel
All, the wiki page is now up at http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/XReader. On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Aakash Goel wrote: > Sure Kevin, will get the wiki page ready asap, and reply back. Thanks. > > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Kevin Grittner < > kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > >>

Re: [HACKERS] xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)

2012-04-27 Thread Aakash Goel
Sure Kevin, will get the wiki page ready asap, and reply back. Thanks. On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > [resending because of postgresql.org bounces on first try] > > Simon Riggs wrote: > > Kevin Grittner wrote: > > >> The GSoC xReader project is intended to be a major

Re: [HACKERS] xReader, double-effort

2012-04-26 Thread Josh Berkus
>> The GSoC xReader project is intended to be a major step toward >> that, by providing a way to translate the WAL stream to a series >> of notifications of logical events to clients which register with >> xReader. >>> >>> Yes, it appears very similar. I didn't know about this. T

Re: [HACKERS] xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)

2012-04-26 Thread Simon Riggs
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Kevin Grittner >> wrote: >>> [resending because of postgresql.org bounces on first try] >>> >>> Simon Riggs wrote: Kevin Grittner wrote: >>> >

Re: [HACKERS] xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)

2012-04-26 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Kevin Grittner > wrote: >> [resending because of postgresql.org bounces on first try] >> >> Simon Riggs wrote: >>> Kevin Grittner wrote: >> The GSoC xReader project is intended to be a major step toward

Re: [HACKERS] xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)

2012-04-26 Thread Simon Riggs
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > [resending because of postgresql.org bounces on first try] > > Simon Riggs wrote: >> Kevin Grittner wrote: > >>> The GSoC xReader project is intended to be a major step toward >>> that, by providing a way to translate the WAL stream to a s