What about http://sourceforge.net/projects/pgaccess/? It looks
inactive but somebody did set it up on 2002-04-25. I think I
found it from Teo's website.
MikE
>
> To sum it up -
>
> -> pgaccess has not been officially updated since January 2001
>
>= there is no real interest in it or t
Hi everybody,
I think, that our "job" is to help this project to grow up to fit the
needs of the people that are using it. In the last months I didn't
notice any activity around it. And there are real expectations that are
still unsatisfied.
This project really needs the fresh air. I think, t
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 10:24:00PM +0200, Iavor Raytchev wrote:
> PROPOSAL
>
> What pgaccess needs is some fresh air - it needs a small and fresh team. It
> needs own web site, own cvs, own mailing list. So that the people who love
> it, write for it and really need it can be easy to identify
Thanks Ross,
This sounds like a resolution.
> I'd suggest keeping a copy of pgaccess in the main tree, as well, and
> pushing versions from the development CVS over on a regular basis.
I am not a cvs expert. We will check this with Stanislav - our system
administrator, when he is back from holi
Hello everybody,
The last message of Chris helped me a lot.
Let me give a short summary why do we (www.pgaccess.org) do what we do.
What are the motives behind and what is the goal.
My company needed pgaccess exactly because of the nice visual 'schema'. The
'schema', however, did not behave we
