Richard Huxton wrote:
It would be nice to have a more dynamic language built-in. I'm not
aware of any BSD-licensed dynamic languages though.
Lua is MIT. And I believe there's even a pl/Lua around. The small size
of the interpreter and ease of C interfacing
would make it ideal, or at least i
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:06:49AM +, Richard Huxton wrote:
> Decibel! wrote:
>> On Feb 14, 2008, at 10:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> =?UTF-8?B?UmFwaGHDq2wgSmFjcXVvdA==?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
so, I propose the use of
NEW[variable_containing_the_column_name]
(which can obv
Raphaël Jacquot wrote:
I recently found myself trying to build a trigger to modify some fields
in a good dozen similarly structured tables in which the similar columns
had different names.
in fact, I got stuck in pl/pgsql with the fact that there's no way to
access the NEW tuple in an indirect
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:06:42AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?UTF-8?B?UmFwaGHDq2wgSmFjcXVvdA==?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > so, I propose the use of
> > NEW[variable_containing_the_column_name]
> > (which can obviously be extended to any tuples)
> > to allow such access.
>
> > what do you
Decibel! wrote:
On Feb 14, 2008, at 10:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
=?UTF-8?B?UmFwaGHDq2wgSmFjcXVvdA==?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
so, I propose the use of
NEW[variable_containing_the_column_name]
(which can obviously be extended to any tuples)
to allow such access.
what do you experts think
On Feb 14, 2008, at 10:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
=?UTF-8?B?UmFwaGHDq2wgSmFjcXVvdA==?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
so, I propose the use of
NEW[variable_containing_the_column_name]
(which can obviously be extended to any tuples)
to allow such access.
what do you experts think ?
Zero cha
=?UTF-8?B?UmFwaGHDq2wgSmFjcXVvdA==?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> so, I propose the use of
> NEW[variable_containing_the_column_name]
> (which can obviously be extended to any tuples)
> to allow such access.
> what do you experts think ?
Zero chance. plplgsql is a strongly typed language,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 07:51:31AM +0100, Raphaël Jacquot wrote:
> in fact, I got stuck in pl/pgsql with the fact that there's no way to
> access the NEW tuple in an indirect way, having the name of the column
> in some variable. (I found that it could be done in plperl, but that
> left me with
hi there,
I recently found myself trying to build a trigger to modify some fields
in a good dozen similarly structured tables in which the similar columns
had different names.
in fact, I got stuck in pl/pgsql with the fact that there's no way to
access the NEW tuple in an indirect way, having
