[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Marc G. Fournier") writes:
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > ...
> > > to pull in those changes that were made to the REL7_3_STABLE branch ...
> >
> > Right.
> >
> > > But, if I did:
> > > cvs checkout -rREL7_3_STABLE pgsql
> > > What would I use as BR
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier writes:
>
> > At this stage, there shouldn't be anything really going *into* STABLE, if
> > we want to get to RC1 ...
>
> If we don't put anything into stable then we will never get to anything.
> Surely we still need to put in some fixes and documentati
Marc G. Fournier writes:
> At this stage, there shouldn't be anything really going *into* STABLE, if
> we want to get to RC1 ...
If we don't put anything into stable then we will never get to anything.
Surely we still need to put in some fixes and documentation updates.
--
Peter Eisentraut [E
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> ...
> > to pull in those changes that were made to the REL7_3_STABLE branch ...
>
> Right.
>
> > But, if I did:
> > cvs checkout -rREL7_3_STABLE pgsql
> > What would I use as BRANCHNAME in the -j to 'pull in' the changes we made
> > to HEAD? Or
...
to pull in those changes that were made to the REL7_3_STABLE branch ...
Right.
But, if I did:
cvs checkout -rREL7_3_STABLE pgsql
What would I use as BRANCHNAME in the -j to 'pull in' the changes we made
to HEAD? Or is there where I'm misunderstanding something?
Use "HEAD" for th
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > Right-o: HEAD is 7.4devel now ...
>
> Will someone merge the 7.3 branch into 7.4devel when the former is
> released? I don't feel like double-patching...
At this stage, there shouldn't be anything really going *into* STABLE, if
Tom Lane writes:
> Right-o: HEAD is 7.4devel now ...
Will someone merge the 7.3 branch into 7.4devel when the former is
released? I don't feel like double-patching...
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have
Out of curiousity, is there an easy (heh) way to upgrade(change?) a
checked out tree to be off the branch?
cvs update -rYOUR_BRANCH_NAME_HERE .
- Thomas
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [E
As I was unable to figure out a way of merging HEAD into a BRANCH
(BRANCH into HEAD is easy), I moved the REL7_3_STABLE tag up to today, so
that the BRANCH is in a more appropriate location.
It is easy to move both directions; I've done it. You need to have the
right stuff in your checked-out tr
On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 15:52, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Perhaps easiest to just re-delete them in the branch? Or is there a
> >> cleaner way?
>
> > Easiest is to re-delete them ...
>
> Okay, done that. REL7_3_STABLE branch now matches CVS tip --- or di
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Perhaps easiest to just re-delete them in the branch? Or is there a
>> cleaner way?
> Easiest is to re-delete them ...
Okay, done that. REL7_3_STABLE branch now matches CVS tip --- or did
until I branded HEAD's configure.in as 7.4devel, a few mo
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > As I was unable to figure out a way of merging HEAD into a BRANCH
> > (BRANCH into HEAD is easy), I moved the REL7_3_STABLE tag up to today, so
> > that the BRANCH is in a more appropriate location.
>
> It
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As I was unable to figure out a way of merging HEAD into a BRANCH
> (BRANCH into HEAD is easy), I moved the REL7_3_STABLE tag up to today, so
> that the BRANCH is in a more appropriate location.
It looks like this was only 99.44% right. There
Morning all ...
As I was unable to figure out a way of merging HEAD into a BRANCH
(BRANCH into HEAD is easy), I moved the REL7_3_STABLE tag up to today, so
that the BRANCH is in a more appropriate location.
I've packaged up beta4 based on the branch, and its currently up
and avai
14 matches
Mail list logo
